REFLECTIONS ON PARSHAT BEHA’ALOTECHA 5786: DIFFERENT CALLINGS, ONE G-D

בס”ד

Integrating Torah into one’s life through reflection and conversation can be an incredibly fun and engaging experience. It’s a journey of discovery, where ancient wisdom and timeless teachings come to life in our daily experiences. Through reflection, we have the opportunity to dive deep into the rich tapestry of Torah, extracting profound insights and lessons that resonate with our modern lives. The joy lies in the ‘aha’ moments, those instances when a Torah verse or story suddenly connects with our personal challenges, aspirations, and values. And when we engage in conversations about Torah with others, it becomes an interactive exploration, where diverse perspectives and interpretations enhance our understanding. These dialogues often spark excitement and intellectual curiosity, making the learning process both enjoyable and fulfilling. Torah becomes a vibrant and dynamic part of our lives, offering not just guidance but also a source of endless fascination, connection, and growth.

NOTE: Don’t feel obligated to go through every source or answer all the questions—unless you want to. Even one source, or one question will give you plenty of material for discussion and meditation. Enjoy this!

Some thoughts about Parshat Beha’alotecha

“And they said, ‘Has the L-RD indeed spoken only with Moses? Has He not spoken also with us?’ And the L-RD heard it.” (Numbers 12:2)

One of the most puzzling episodes in the Torah occurs when Miriam and Aaron speak about Moses and question his separation from ordinary family life. According to the Sages, they were troubled by the fact that Moses had separated from his wife. After all, they too were prophets. G-d had spoken to them as well. If prophecy did not require such extreme separation from family life for them, why should Moses be different?

Rashi explains that Miriam and Aaron reasoned: “Has G-d spoken only with Moses? Has He not spoken also with us?” In other words, they could not understand why Moses adopted a level of asceticism and separation that seemed unnecessary. They assumed that because they shared the experience of prophecy, they shared the same spiritual requirements.

G-d’s response reveals that this assumption was mistaken. Moses was not merely another prophet. His mission was unique. While other prophets received revelation at particular times and under particular conditions, Moses stood in a different relationship to G-d altogether. The issue was not superiority or inferiority. It was difference of calling.

This insight has important implications for Noahides.

Many Noahides eventually encounter a similar question. If G-d created all human beings and speaks to all humanity through the Torah, why are there different obligations? Why are Jews commanded in 613 mitzvot while Noahides are obligated in the Seven Noahide Laws? If seven categories are sufficient for the nations, why were 613 given to Israel? Conversely, if 613 commandments represent a higher spiritual path, should Noahides seek to take on as many of them as possible?

The Torah’s answer may be found in the lesson of Moses, Aaron, and Miriam. Equality before G-d does not mean identical missions. G-d addressed Aaron. G-d addressed Miriam. G-d addressed Moses. Yet each had a different role within His plan. The fact that one person’s mission contains responsibilities that another’s does not does not diminish either one.

The same principle applies to Israel and the nations. The Torah presents Israel as a covenantal nation with a unique historical and religious mission. The nations of the world are given a different framework centered on the Seven Noahide Laws, which themselves encompass a broad vision of justice, morality, reverence for G-d, and the construction of righteous societies. According to Rambam, a Noahide who accepts these commandments because they were commanded by G-d through Moses is among the Chasidei Umot HaOlam, the Righteous of the Nations of the World, and has a share in the World to Come.

Modern culture often assumes that equality requires uniformity. The Torah teaches otherwise. A symphony does not consist of a single instrument repeated many times. Different instruments play different parts, yet all serve the same composition. Likewise, G-d’s relationship with humanity contains both universal and particular dimensions. There is one Creator, one moral order, and one ultimate purpose, yet different peoples and individuals may be called to fulfill that purpose in different ways.

The challenge, then, is not to compare callings but to fulfill them faithfully. Miriam and Aaron erred when they measured Moses by their own experience. We make a similar mistake whenever we assume that every spiritual path must look the same. The question is not whether someone else’s mission appears larger, more demanding, or more visible than our own. The question is whether we are responding fully to the responsibilities that G-d has actually placed before us.

The lesson of Beha’alotecha is that G-d addresses all humanity, but He does not necessarily address everyone in the same way. Spiritual maturity begins when we stop comparing assignments and start fulfilling them.

Now, reflect on the following questions:

Why do people often assume that equality requires everyone to have the same role or responsibilities?
What was the mistake in Miriam and Aaron’s reasoning about Moses?
How does modern society encourage comparison rather than faithful fulfillment of one’s own mission?
What are the advantages of having different callings within a single divine plan?
Am I more focused on understanding someone else’s assignment, or on fulfilling my own?

Shabbat Shalom

By Rabbi Tani Burton

More shiurim of Rabbi Tani Burton