בס "ד

Parashat Korach
This week’s reading is about the rebellion of Korach againts his own cousins Moshe and Aharon. He complained why are they raising themselves above all the rest of the people if everyone is holy. However, he himself wanted to be a leader also, so, what ws his problem with Moshe and Aharon?
Based on Likkutei Sichot, vol. 8, p. 114

Parashat Korach: Leadership, Conflict, and Connection

This week’s Torah portion is called Korach, named after Korach, a cousin of Moses and Aaron, who were brothers.

Korach organized a rebellion against his cousins Moses and Aaron. He challenged them by saying:

“The entire congregation is holy. G-d is present within each and every one of them. Why, then, do you raise yourselves above the rest of the people? Why do you place yourselves above the whole congregation?”

At first glance, we need to understand a very simple fact: Korach himself belonged to the tribe of Levi.

The Levites were already elevated above the rest of the nation in the sense that they had a unique role and responsibility. Above them were the priests, the Cohanim, but the Levites themselves were also part of a group set apart for service.

Korach was part of that leadership structure.

Furthermore, the Torah tells us that Korach gathered 250 men to join his rebellion against Moses. These were not ordinary people; they were leaders of the congregation.

So we must ask: if they themselves were leaders, how could they claim, “Why do you raise yourselves above everyone else?”

Moreover, when Moses responds to Korach, he says:

“Is it not enough that G-d chose you to be a Levite? Do you also seek to become a priest?”

From this, we see that Korach was not opposed to leadership itself, nor was he against the idea that some people have greater responsibilities than others. After all, he was already a leader, and he desired an even higher position.

So what was Korach really searching for? What was he truly looking for?

He was not rebelling against leadership as such. He was rebelling against the type of leadership represented by Moses and Aaron.

To understand this, we first need to understand the nature of disagreement itself.

The Purpose of Disagreement

In Hebrew, a dispute or argument is called a machloket.

The truth is that every idea that exists in the world ultimately comes from G-d. There is nothing we can think of that was not, in some way, created by G-d. Otherwise, it would never even enter our minds.

This does not mean that every thought is good or should be acted upon. We have free will and must choose how to use the abilities and ideas that G-d has given us.

However, if human beings have the capacity to argue, disagree, and even rebel, it is because these possibilities were created by G-d.

Where do we first see this idea in the Torah?

On the second day of Creation, G-d separated the waters above from the waters below. The second day introduced division and separation.

When we look at the conclusion of each day of Creation, the Torah usually says, “And G-d saw that it was good.”

But on the second day, this phrase is missing.

G-d did not say that the work of the second day was good.

Our Sages explain that separation and disagreement, by themselves, are not good.

However, on the third day, the Torah says, “And G-d saw that it was good” twice: once for the completion of the previous day’s work and once for the work of the third day itself.

This teaches us that although disagreement is not good in itself, it can lead to something positive when it is refined and resolved.

After an argument comes the possibility of peace.

Two people may disagree—one says yes, the other says no—but they can rise to a higher level of understanding. They can recognize something greater than themselves and allow that higher perspective to bring peace between them.

Korach embraced the negative aspect of disagreement, but he failed to reach the positive outcome that should follow: reconciliation.

Aaron’s Leadership

How do we see this idea in the story of Korach?

Korach opposed the kind of leadership embodied by Aaron.

Aaron’s leadership was based on connection. Our Sages explain that Aaron loved peace and pursued peace in every area of life.

If two people had a business dispute, Aaron would approach each one and help them reconcile.

If a husband and wife were arguing, Aaron would work to restore peace between them.

He constantly sought to bring people together.

This helps explain why, when Aaron passed away, the entire nation mourned him.

The Torah tells us that all of Israel wept for Aaron.

When Moses passed away, the Torah specifically mentions that the men mourned him. But when Aaron passed away, men and women alike mourned his loss.

¿Por qué?

Because Aaron had touched everyone’s lives. He had restored peace between husbands and wives, between neighbors, and between members of the community.

Korach opposed this model of leadership.

In his view, leadership resembled the separation created on the second day of Creation: there are those who lead and those who follow, and the two remain distinct from one another.

Moses, Aaron, and the priests embodied the opposite approach.

Yes, leadership requires structure. Some people know more, some know less. Some are called to guide, while others are called to follow.

If everyone tries to lead at the same time, it becomes impossible to move forward.

A community needs leaders.

But leaders must remain connected to the people they serve.

A true leader understands the needs of the people, feels their concerns, and remains aware of their reality.

Only then can someone become the kind of leader the Torah describes.

Korach also wanted to lead, but his model of leadership was disconnected from the actual needs of the people.

The Torah’s Response

After Korach’s rebellion, the Torah introduces the gifts that the people were required to give to the priests: portions of produce, wool, and other offerings.

Why does the Torah respond to Korach’s rebellion with these commandments?

Because these gifts created an ongoing relationship between the people and their leaders.

The people regularly came to the priests. They spoke with them, learned from them, and sought their guidance.

The priests received material support, but in return they offered wisdom, teaching, and spiritual leadership.

The relationship went both ways.

In this way, the Torah “repairs” Korach’s mistake by strengthening the connection between leadership and the people.

The lesson is clear.

If you want to be a leader according to the values and teachings of the Torah, you must remain aware of the people you lead.

You must care about what they need, not only about what you need.

True leadership is not about elevating yourself above others.

It is about using your position to serve, connect, and bring peace.

Good Shabbos.

Charla del rabino Tuvia Serber


Lo anterior es una representación del texto hablado convertido en texto escrito.

Copyright, todos los derechos reservados. Si le ha gustado este artículo, le animamos a seguir difundiéndolo.

Nuestros blogs pueden contener textos/citas/referencias/enlaces que incluyan material protegido por derechos de autor de 
Mechon-Mamre.org, Aish.com, Sefaria.org, Jabad.orgy/o AskNoah.orgque utilizamos de acuerdo con sus políticas.